Description
The migration of contaminants in gas or vapour phase or as fine particulate or aerosol in gas or vapour through the repository.
Category
Categorisation as a Feature, Event and/or Process.
Features
are physical components of the disposal system and environment being assessed. Examples include waste packaging, backfill, surface soils. Features typically interact with one another via processes and in some cases events.Events
are dynamic interactions among features that occur over time periods that are short compared to the safety assessment timeframe such as a gas explosion or meteorite impact.- "Processes" are issues or dynamic interactions among features that generally occur over a significant proportion of the safety assessment timeframe and may occur over the whole of this timeframe. Events and processes may be coupled to one another (i.e. may influence one another).
The classification of a FEP as an event or process depends upon the assessment context, because the classification is undertaken with reference to an assessment timeframe. In this generic IFEP List, many IFEPs are classified as both Events and Processes; users will need to decide which of these classifications is relevant to their context and its timeframes.
- Event
- Process
Relevance to Performance and Safety
The “Relevance to Performance and Safety” field contains an explanation of how the IFEP might influence the performance and safety of the disposal system under consideration through its impact on the evolution of the repository system and on the release, migration and/or uptake of repository-derived contaminants.
Radionuclides and other contaminants may be transported through the EBS and adjacent geosphere due to gas movement. This transport may be either direct, the radionuclides and other contaminants being in gaseous form (e.g. C-14 labelled carbon dioxide or methane). Alternatively, the movement of gas may cause other radionuclide-bearing or contaminant-bearing phases to move by advection. For example, aerosols or solid particles to which radionuclides or other contaminants are bound may be transported with moving gas. Movement of gas may also push water, within which radionuclides or other contaminants are transported, either in solution or bound to / in colloids.
2000 List
A reference to the related FEP(s) within the 2000 NEA IFEP List.
Related References
-
Hoch A, Swift B, Smart N and Smith P (), Gas Generation from HLW and Spent Fuel, NPO004726, RWM NDA, 005126/001 Issue 4, https://rwm.nda.gov.uk/publication/gas-generation-from-hlw-and-spent-fuel/
-
Watson S, Benbow S, Suckling P, Towler G, Metcalfe R, Penfold J, Hicks T and Pekala M (), Assessment of Issues Relating to Pre-closure to Post-closure Gas Generation in a geological disposal facility (GDF), A Quintessa Ltd report for NDA RWMD, QRS/1378ZP/R1
-
W. Rodwell, S. Norris, W. Cool, M. Cuñado, L. Johnson, M. Mäntynen, W. Müller, P. Sellin, M. Snellman, J. Talandier, T. Vieno and S. Vines (), A thematic network on gas issues in safety assessment of deep repositories for radioactive waste (GASNET), European Commission Report EUR 20620 EN, https://bookshop.europa.eu/en/a-thematic-network-on-gas-issues-in-safety-assessment-of-deep-repositories-for-radioactive-waste-gasnet--pbKINA20620/
-
S. Norris (), FORGE project: updated consideration of gas generation and migration in the safety case, in R.P. Shaw (ed.) Gas generation and migration in deep geological waste repositories, Special Publications, Geological Society, London, 415, 241-258, https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/SP415