NEA Mandates and Structures


Expert Group on a Post-accident Food Safety Framework (EGFSF)

Chair(s): Ann MCGARRY, Ireland
Secretary:  Jan-Hendrik KRUSE
(jan-hendrik.kruse@oecd-nea.org)
Vice-Chair(s): Brendan NIEMIRA, United States
Member(s):All NEA member countries*
Russia (Suspended*)
*Russian Federation suspended pursuant to a decision of the OECD Council.
Full participant(s): European Commission
Under the NEA Statute
Observer(s)(International Organisation): International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
By agreement
Date of creation:01 June 2022
End of mandate:31 May 2024

Mandate (Document reference):

  • CRPPH-79 Meeting - Draft Summary Record, Agreements and Decisions, held virtually on 21-23 April 2021 [NEA/CRPPH(2021)9]
  • Summary Record and Agreements and Commitments of the CRPPH Bureau Meeting – 13 Dec 2021 [NEA/CRPPH(2022)1]
  • Summary Record and Agreements of the CRPPH Special Bureau Meeting held remotely on 7 September 2021 [NEA/CRPPH(2021)13]
  • Mandate of the Expert Group on a Post-accident Food Safety Framework (EGFSF) [NEA/CRPPH(2022)8]

Mandate (Document extract):

Extract of document NEA/CRPPH(2022)8

Mandate

Background

The experience derived from past nuclear accidents, such as Chernobyl or Fukushima, has shown that the management of contaminated food after such events can lead to a number of health and socioeconomic impacts that have to be addressed under the national sovereignty of all affected countries. At the same time, experience has clearly shown that a lack of international harmonisation and independent scientific evaluation of the situation cannot only lead to increased confusion around food safety in affected and non-affected populations, but can also hamper international trade and lead to disagreement(s) between countries.

In 2014, the NEA presented the first argument for the need of a framework for the post-accident management of contaminated food and outlined a path towards an independent scientific review of measures taken in this regard. The aim of this framework was to reinforce public and international confidence in the implementation of food safety decisions. Since then, there have been a number of (updates of) international guidelines and recommendations issued by different international bodies such as the IAEA, the ICRP, and the FAO joint work with WHO (...).

The CRPPH during its 79th meeting, as well as the CRPPH Bureau through its meetings in September and December 2021, decided to revitalise the NEA Food Safety Framework project and agreed to circulate the draft mandate of the Expert Group on a Post-Accident Food Safety Framework (EGFSF) for the CRPPH approval by written procedure.

Scope

The EGFSF supports the CRPPH in promoting “international collaboration on specific radiological protection and radiation-related public health topics of interest to the NEA member countries in the framework of the NEA Strategic Plan” [cf. NEA/NE(2017)13, Appendix I].

The EGFSF also supports the Working Party on Nuclear Emergency Matters (WPNEM) in “identifying and investigating as appropriate further advancements in all aspects of [emergency preparedness and response (EPR)] for nuclear/radiological emergencies (including accidents and consequence management of malicious acts), for example … management of large scale contamination of food and feeding stuff;” [cf. NEA/CRPPH/INEX(2020)1/FINAL].

Objectives

The objectives of the Expert Group are to:

  • Analyse the relevancy of and opportunities for pursuing the project on a NEA “Framework for the Post-accident Management of Contaminated Food”, introduced in the eponymous report published in 2014 [NEA/CRPPH/R(2014)4];
  • Review, update and/or operationalise the above document to develop a process or methodology, fitting it carefully into the existing and emerging international system of guidelines/recommendations in this field;
  • Promote consent and identify a suitable mechanism to give the process or methodology the necessary policy, political or legal foundation to have a positive and meaningful impact.

Working methods

  • The EGFSF will report periodically to the CRPPH as appropriate and will assist the Committee with its work;
  • The EGFSF’s work will follow a three-step approach:
    1. Analyse what has been done on NEA/CRPPH level historically and evaluate the value of this work and potential ways forward in view of the international regulatory developments since 2014;
    2. If an added value will be identified and based on the existing documents, operationalise the science-based peer-review process to enhance international harmonisation and trust in the field;
    3. Identify options to implement the overall process through a suitable approach on the policy, political or legal level. Promote consent on the approach taken among NEA member countries and other adhering countries.
  • Activities 1 & 2 should be completed by CRPPH-81 in early April 2023; activity 3 will then be completed by CRPPH-82 in late March 2024. As part of activity 3, the approach taken should be presented to the NEA Steering Committee on Nuclear Energy.

Interactions

Next to the European Commission as participant and the IAEA as observer, the EGFSF may invite experts from the following international organisations to participate in specific meetings: the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the World Trade Organization (WTO) as well as their sub-ordinated bodies. The EGFSF may also invite experts from other OECD directorates and other relevant organisations.

Deliverables

  • Periodical presentations and updates of the EGFSF’s work to the CRPPH and its Bureau as appropriate;
  • A short written strategic outline on the feasibility and added value of a NEA framework for post-accident management of contaminated food; possibly complemented by an updated version of the report NEA/CRPPH/R(2014)4;
  • A report developing the overall science-based peer-review process in support of the post-accident management of contaminated food, including a suggestion for the formulation of a policy, political, and/or legal basis for its implementation.