SINBAD ABSTRACT NEA-1517/74
Photon Leakage Spectra from Al, Ti, Fe, Cu, Zr, Pb, U238 Spheres
1. Name of Experiment:
------------------
Measurement of Photon Leakage Spectra from Spherical and Hemispherical Samples
of Aluminium, Titanium, Iron, Copper, Zirconium, Lead, and Uranium-238 with a
Central 14-MeV Neutron Source (1992).
2. Objective of Experiment:
-----------------------
Measurement of spectra and leakages of photons from thick spherical and hemispherical
samples of the most commonly used structural materials irradiated with a Central
14-MeV Neutron Source for validation of existing nuclear data on gamma-production
of these elements.
3. Description of Source and Experimental Setup:
--------------------------------------------
The experimental configuration is presented in Fig. 1.
An installation NG-200 (200-KeV deuteron accelerator with the current of separated
D+ ion beam of up to 1 mA) was used as 14-MeV neutron source. The target was a
zirconium foil saturated with tritium. Design of the target unit is presented in
Fig. 2. The target was placed in the centre of spherical samples of inside diameter
Øin=100 mm and outside diameter Øout = 200 mm. Weights of the samples used are
given in Table 1.
4. Measurement System and Uncertainties:
------------------------------------
The measurements were performed using a scintillation detector having a stilbene
crystal with dimensions of Ø 60 x 60 mm. Gamma-neutron separation was done using
the scintillation pulse shape.
Direct 14-MeV neutrons from the target that were not scattered by the sample were
delayed by a steel rod of diameter Ø 30 mm and length L=400 mm, placed in the
immediate vicinity of the sample.
Between the source and the detector, a concrete 1.5-m thick wall with a collimator
was situated (Fig. 1). To reduce the background of scattered photons and cosmic
rays the detector was placed in a shield of 50-mm thick lead bricks. In addition,
to reduce the background from secondary gamma-rays falling on the detector due to
interaction of neutrons with materials surrounding the detector, a polyethylene
cylinder of diameter 100 mm and length L=200 mm was placed into the collimator.
The cylinder substantially (approximately by 10 times) absorbed neutrons and not
very heavily (2-3 times) absorbed gamma-rays.
The 14-MeV neutron flux was measured with an all-wave detector pre-calibrated in
absolute measurements of the neutron flux of the installation. These absolute
measurements were conducted using the activation method and the reaction
Al-27(n,alpha)Na-24. When replacing the samples, the indications of the all-wave
detector were adjusted according to the flux amplification/attenuation coefficient
of the samples used. The coefficients were measured experimentally as a
relationship of count rate of the all-wave detector with and without the sample.
These coefficients are presented in Table 2.
4.1. Measuring equipment and processing of experimental spectra.
The photon spectra were measured using a scintillation detector having a stilbene
crystal with dimensions of Ø 60x60 mm. Measured energy range is 0.3-8.0 MeV.
Energy distribution for lines Co-60 (1.17 and 1.33 MeV) was about 10%. At energies
higher than 3 MeV it was enhanced up to 6-7% and at energies lower than 0.5 MeV
it went down to 15-20%.
The choice of the stilbene crystal makes it possible to avoid many difficulties,
namely: It is easy to solve the problem of neutron-gamma separation using
scintillation pulse shape.
Neutron activation of the detector material doesn’t disturb results.
Practically the only type of photon interaction with the crystal material is the
Compton effect which makes the mathematical processing of the primary
experimental spectra significantly easer.
Comparatively poor energy resolution of this method is of little importance for
the problem of verification of gamma-production data used in various practical
calculations. Processing of experimental electron-recoil spectra for transferring
them into the photon spectra, was conducted using the method of “generalized
differentiation”. The method is described in detail in paper [1].
The results of measurements are presented in Table 3.
4.2. Measurement uncertainty.
The measurement uncertainty is a sum of the following components:
Statistical uncertainty
This uncertainty is rather great mainly due to the principle of obtaining of
results by the differentiation method. Although the total amount of counted
pulses in each spectrum reaches (1.5-2)·106, the calculation of the effect as
a difference of great numbers in narrow energy ranges leads to a noticeable
statistical uncertainty especially at low energies. The value of this uncertainty
depends greatly on the form of investigated spectra of each specific sample.
The uncertainty of the main lines is estimated within the limits of ∆1=+-5 % for
all elements. This uncertainty can be inferred for example from the photon
spectra of spheres and hemispheres of one element. We can see the repeat of the
spectra structure typical for the given element against the background of
uncorrelated fluctuations conditioned by statistical uncertainty.
Uncertainty in the detector efficiency.
The detector efficiency was determined by measuring the spectra of (reference)
standard preparations of 22Na, 137Cs, 60Co, 24Na. Within the energy range
0.5-3.0 MeV this uncertainty is estimated as +-5% and its value is primarily
connected with the uncertainty in recalculation of gamma-fluxes of the standard
preparations to the actual experimental configuration, which differ drastically.
The standard preparations were placed at 25-50 cm from the detector, whereas in
the real experiment the gamma-radiation came from the sample at a distance of
8.5 m from the detector in the presence of the collimator, air and various
objects in the experimental hall. Within the energy range 3-8 MeV the efficiency
uncertainty may reach ∆2=7-8% due to the absence of standard preparations with
such energy. Here we were used only calculations of intensities of the
well-studied gamma-lines: 4.43 MeV for carbon and 6.13 MeV for oxygen.
Uncertainty in mathematical processing of the experimental spectra.
Origination of this uncertainty is connected with the uncertainty of knowledge
of the response function for the detector throughout the range of measured
photon energies. Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 show that after mathematical processing of
the apparatus spectra of standard preparations, the photon spectra obtained
still have oscillating “tails” of small minima and peaks. The height of these
peaks does not exceed +-10% and on average makes up ∆3=+-7%, which indicates the
obtained accuracy of processing.
Summing all the above mentioned uncertainties, one can obtain for absolute values:
For the relative measurements and comparison of spectrum forms of various
elements or samples, the accuracy is naturally better and reaches +- 5%.
5. Description of Results and Analysis; Comparison with Calculations.
------------------------------------
Figures 5-11 show that the photon spectra are very various and individual for
each element. The spectra of the hemispheres repeat the structure of the sphere’s
spectra to small fluctuations in the order of +-5% of the intensities of the main
peaks. This shows the high relative accuracy of the measurements performed. In
some cases the spectra calculated using the code MCNP code with libraries ENDF/B6
and ENDL-92 differ greatly from the experimental ones and fall far outside the
limits of experimental uncertainty (See Zirconium, for example).
Let us consider separately the situation for every element under study.
- Aluminium. Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 show, that general form of the spectrum is repeated
both in the calculations and in the experiments. However the intensities of
these lines in different calculations and the experiment are different. Thus,
for example, the very intensive in calculations line at 1.014 MeV does not
confirmed by the experiment wherein it is at least 3 times lower. The total
amount of photons in the experimental spectra is close to the ENDF-B/5
calculations.
It should be noted that 14-MeV neutrons cause reaction Al-27(n,alpha)Na-24. The
generated 24Na decomposes (half-life is about 15 hours), emitting gamma-quanta
with energies of 1.37 and 2.75 MeV. In the process of measurements, these
gamma-quanta belong to the spectrum measured. As a result, the form of the
obtained spectrum depends on the time of measurements. If the process of
measurements takes less than the half-life period (as in our case we have), the
contribution of these lines occurs to be minor, and in long-term many-hour
measurements an equilibrium distribution is established, wherein the intensity
of these lines rises sharply.
- Titanium (see Fig. 7 and Fig. 8).
For titanium very significant discrepancies are observed between the
calculations and the experiments. In the calculated spectra only one 0.511 MeV
line of positron annihilation is seen. The presence of this line in all the
samples is due to the effect of positron annihilation. The rest part of the
calculated spectra is presented by continuous distribution, while the experiment
gives complex spectra form with the lines at 0.889, 0.983, 1.438, and 2.315 MeV.
These lines are well-known from the Atlas [2]. The total amount of photons in
the ENDF/B-6 calculation is nearly two times greater than that in the experiment.
- Iron (see Fig. 9 and Fig. 10).
Iron is the most studied element. However, there are also discrepancies
for iron but they are not such large as for other elements. The total amount of
photons in the calculations and experiments differ insignificantly (within 10%).
- Copper (Fig. 11).
Our experimental data for copper are significantly differ from the
calculated ones. It seems that there are no reliable experimental data for
this element at all.
- Zirconium (Fig. 12 and Fig. 13).
Unfortunately, the ENDF/B6 version available for us has no data on the gamma-
production for zirconium. Besides the base 2.188 MeV line and the 0.511 MeV
line common to all elements, the zirconium experimental spectra have one twin
line at 0.912 and 0.935 MeV, not separating in our experiments. In the ENDL-92
calculation these lines are not present. At the same time the continuous component
of spectrum in the calculation is much overestimated. The total amount of photons
in the calculation with ENDL-92 is 24% higher than that in the experiment.
The total photons energy in the experiments and calculations agree nearly due
to the difference in the spectra from.
- Lead (Fig. 14 and Fig. 15).
The experimental photon spectrum from lead agrees well with the ENDF/B6
calculations throughout the whole energy range. The calculation ignores the
experimental line close to 2.2 MeV.
- Uranium-238 (Fig. 16 and Fig. 17).
The calculated gamma-spectrum of uranium is distinct not very significantly
from the experimental one. In the experiment, a certain structure is
outlined in the form of lines at 0.5, 1.2, 2.3, and 4.4 MeV. The last two
peaks are probably connected with the experimental configuration and the
scattered background (capture of slow neutrons by hydrogen of concrete walls
and inelastic scattering 14-MeV neutrons in polyethylene).
Summarizing the analysis of the results, it is possible to say that there is
significant difference in gamma-production of the calculations and the
experiments even for the most common elements, and the accepted systems of
nuclear data should be appropriately updated. Besides, it should be noted
that the studies conducted refer only to the energy region of incident
neutrons close to 14 MeV. The region of intermediate neutron energies 5-14 MeV
is still unstudied, and it is possible to suppose that the discrepancies
between the calculations and experiments in this range will be even greater.
The problem of correlation between total neutron cross-section and
gamma-production cross-section still remains unclear. If such correlation
exists, the functions of photon leakage depending on the neutron energy
may be very complicated (according to the structure of full cross-sections).
Therefore, the extrapolation of data on photon-production into unstudied
region of neutron energies will be unreliable. It is necessary to conduct
experiments on gamma-leakage for neutron energies ranging from 5 to 10 MeV.
6. Special Features of the Experiment:
----------------------------------
Method of generalized differentiation with semi-empirically determined
coefficients for transferring apparatus electron-recoil spectra into
energy spectra.
7. Author/Organizer
----------------
Experiment and analysis:
A.I. Saukov, V.D. Lyutov, E.N. Lipilina
RFNC-VNIITF
(Zababakhin Russian Federal Nuclear Center –
All-Russian Scientific Researching Institute of Technical Physics)
Vasiliev Street 13, P.O. Box 245
Snezhinsk
Chelyabinsk Region
456770 Russia
Compiler of data for SINBAD:
Elena N.Lipilina
RFNC-VNIITF
Reviewer of compiled data:
I. Kodeli
OECD/NEA, 12 bd des Iles, 92130 Issy les Moulineaux, France
8. Availability:
------------
Unrestricted
9. References:
----------
[1] A.I. Saukov, B.I. Sukhanov, V.D. Lyutov, et al, "Proton Leakage from Spherical
and Hemispherical Samples with a Central 14MeV Neutron Source", Nucl.Sci.Eng.,
V.142, No.2, p.158, 2002
[2] M.R. Ahmed, A.M. Demidov, et al, "Atlas of gamma-ray spectra from the inelastic
scattering of reactor fast neutrons", Moscow, Atomizdat, 1978
[3] A. I. Saukov, E. N. Lipilina, V. D. Lyutov , "Measurements of Neutron and
Photon Leakage from Spherical and Hemispherical Samples with a Central 14-MeV
Neutron Source as a Possible Type of Benchmarks", presented at the Int. Conf.
on Radiation Safety, ICRS10 – RPS-2004, May 9-14, 2004, Madeira, Portugal
10. Data and format:
10. Data and format:
Description of detailed files
No. Filename Size(byte) Contents
---------------------------------------------------------
1 rfnc_ph.htm 19630 This information file
2 MCNP5.inp 1696 Input data for the MCNP5 calculation
3 fig1exp.jpg 40098 Fig. 1. Geometry of experiment
4 fig2mishen.jpg 48960 Fig. 2. Design of the target unit
5 fig3na22.jpg 25895 Fig. 3. Gamma-spectrum of Na-22 specimen
6 fig4na24.jpg 23682 Fig. 4. Gamma-spectrum of Na -24 specimen
7 fig5alsp.jpg 45547 Fig. 5. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Al sphere
8 fig6alhs.jpg 46422 Fig. 6. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Al hemisphere
9 fig7tisp.jpg 47585 Fig. 7. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Ti sphere
10 fig8tihs.jpg 45727 Fig. 8. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Ti hemisphere
11 fig9fesp.jpg 45593 Fig. 9. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Fe sphere
12 fig10fehs.jpg 47799 Fig. 10. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Fe hemisphere
13 fig11cusp.jpg 47492 Fig. 11. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Cu sphere
14 fig12zrsp.jpg 43297 Fig. 12. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Zr sphere
15 fig13zrhs.jpg 43534 Fig. 13. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Zr hemisphere
16 fig14pbsp.jpg 47513 Fig. 14. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Pb sphere
17 fig15pbhs.jpg 50146 Fig. 15. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from Pb hemisphere
18 fig16u8sp.jpg 43560 Fig. 16. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from U-238 sphere
19 fig17u8hs.jpg 49637 Fig. 17. Calculated and experimental spectra
of photon yield from U-238 hemisphere
20 tab1samples.txt 163 Table 1. Parameters of samples used
21 tab2leakage.txt 192 Table 2. Total neutron yield from used samples
per one neutron of a 14 MeV source
22 tab3result.txt 12488 Table 3. Results of measurements
23 tab3result.xls 31744 Table 3. Results of measurements
24 mad_rep.pdf 260641 Reference 3
SINBAD Benchmark Generation Date: 09/2005
SINBAD Benchmark Last Update: 03/2006