SINBAD ABSTRACT NEA-1517/74
Photon Leakage Spectra from Al, Ti, Fe, Cu, Zr, Pb, U238 Spheres
1. Name of Experiment: ------------------ Measurement of Photon Leakage Spectra from Spherical and Hemispherical Samples of Aluminium, Titanium, Iron, Copper, Zirconium, Lead, and Uranium-238 with a Central 14-MeV Neutron Source (1992). 2. Objective of Experiment: ----------------------- Measurement of spectra and leakages of photons from thick spherical and hemispherical samples of the most commonly used structural materials irradiated with a Central 14-MeV Neutron Source for validation of existing nuclear data on gamma-production of these elements. 3. Description of Source and Experimental Setup: -------------------------------------------- The experimental configuration is presented in Fig. 1. An installation NG-200 (200-KeV deuteron accelerator with the current of separated D+ ion beam of up to 1 mA) was used as 14-MeV neutron source. The target was a zirconium foil saturated with tritium. Design of the target unit is presented in Fig. 2. The target was placed in the centre of spherical samples of inside diameter Øin=100 mm and outside diameter Øout = 200 mm. Weights of the samples used are given in Table 1. 4. Measurement System and Uncertainties: ------------------------------------ The measurements were performed using a scintillation detector having a stilbene crystal with dimensions of Ø 60 x 60 mm. Gamma-neutron separation was done using the scintillation pulse shape. Direct 14-MeV neutrons from the target that were not scattered by the sample were delayed by a steel rod of diameter Ø 30 mm and length L=400 mm, placed in the immediate vicinity of the sample. Between the source and the detector, a concrete 1.5-m thick wall with a collimator was situated (Fig. 1). To reduce the background of scattered photons and cosmic rays the detector was placed in a shield of 50-mm thick lead bricks. In addition, to reduce the background from secondary gamma-rays falling on the detector due to interaction of neutrons with materials surrounding the detector, a polyethylene cylinder of diameter 100 mm and length L=200 mm was placed into the collimator. The cylinder substantially (approximately by 10 times) absorbed neutrons and not very heavily (2-3 times) absorbed gamma-rays. The 14-MeV neutron flux was measured with an all-wave detector pre-calibrated in absolute measurements of the neutron flux of the installation. These absolute measurements were conducted using the activation method and the reaction Al-27(n,alpha)Na-24. When replacing the samples, the indications of the all-wave detector were adjusted according to the flux amplification/attenuation coefficient of the samples used. The coefficients were measured experimentally as a relationship of count rate of the all-wave detector with and without the sample. These coefficients are presented in Table 2. 4.1. Measuring equipment and processing of experimental spectra. The photon spectra were measured using a scintillation detector having a stilbene crystal with dimensions of Ø 60x60 mm. Measured energy range is 0.3-8.0 MeV. Energy distribution for lines Co-60 (1.17 and 1.33 MeV) was about 10%. At energies higher than 3 MeV it was enhanced up to 6-7% and at energies lower than 0.5 MeV it went down to 15-20%. The choice of the stilbene crystal makes it possible to avoid many difficulties, namely: It is easy to solve the problem of neutron-gamma separation using scintillation pulse shape. Neutron activation of the detector material doesn’t disturb results. Practically the only type of photon interaction with the crystal material is the Compton effect which makes the mathematical processing of the primary experimental spectra significantly easer. Comparatively poor energy resolution of this method is of little importance for the problem of verification of gamma-production data used in various practical calculations. Processing of experimental electron-recoil spectra for transferring them into the photon spectra, was conducted using the method of “generalized differentiation”. The method is described in detail in paper [1]. The results of measurements are presented in Table 3. 4.2. Measurement uncertainty. The measurement uncertainty is a sum of the following components: Statistical uncertainty This uncertainty is rather great mainly due to the principle of obtaining of results by the differentiation method. Although the total amount of counted pulses in each spectrum reaches (1.5-2)·106, the calculation of the effect as a difference of great numbers in narrow energy ranges leads to a noticeable statistical uncertainty especially at low energies. The value of this uncertainty depends greatly on the form of investigated spectra of each specific sample. The uncertainty of the main lines is estimated within the limits of ∆1=+-5 % for all elements. This uncertainty can be inferred for example from the photon spectra of spheres and hemispheres of one element. We can see the repeat of the spectra structure typical for the given element against the background of uncorrelated fluctuations conditioned by statistical uncertainty. Uncertainty in the detector efficiency. The detector efficiency was determined by measuring the spectra of (reference) standard preparations of 22Na, 137Cs, 60Co, 24Na. Within the energy range 0.5-3.0 MeV this uncertainty is estimated as +-5% and its value is primarily connected with the uncertainty in recalculation of gamma-fluxes of the standard preparations to the actual experimental configuration, which differ drastically. The standard preparations were placed at 25-50 cm from the detector, whereas in the real experiment the gamma-radiation came from the sample at a distance of 8.5 m from the detector in the presence of the collimator, air and various objects in the experimental hall. Within the energy range 3-8 MeV the efficiency uncertainty may reach ∆2=7-8% due to the absence of standard preparations with such energy. Here we were used only calculations of intensities of the well-studied gamma-lines: 4.43 MeV for carbon and 6.13 MeV for oxygen. Uncertainty in mathematical processing of the experimental spectra. Origination of this uncertainty is connected with the uncertainty of knowledge of the response function for the detector throughout the range of measured photon energies. Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 show that after mathematical processing of the apparatus spectra of standard preparations, the photon spectra obtained still have oscillating “tails” of small minima and peaks. The height of these peaks does not exceed +-10% and on average makes up ∆3=+-7%, which indicates the obtained accuracy of processing. Summing all the above mentioned uncertainties, one can obtain for absolute values: For the relative measurements and comparison of spectrum forms of various elements or samples, the accuracy is naturally better and reaches +- 5%. 5. Description of Results and Analysis; Comparison with Calculations. ------------------------------------ Figures 5-11 show that the photon spectra are very various and individual for each element. The spectra of the hemispheres repeat the structure of the sphere’s spectra to small fluctuations in the order of +-5% of the intensities of the main peaks. This shows the high relative accuracy of the measurements performed. In some cases the spectra calculated using the code MCNP code with libraries ENDF/B6 and ENDL-92 differ greatly from the experimental ones and fall far outside the limits of experimental uncertainty (See Zirconium, for example). Let us consider separately the situation for every element under study. - Aluminium. Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 show, that general form of the spectrum is repeated both in the calculations and in the experiments. However the intensities of these lines in different calculations and the experiment are different. Thus, for example, the very intensive in calculations line at 1.014 MeV does not confirmed by the experiment wherein it is at least 3 times lower. The total amount of photons in the experimental spectra is close to the ENDF-B/5 calculations. It should be noted that 14-MeV neutrons cause reaction Al-27(n,alpha)Na-24. The generated 24Na decomposes (half-life is about 15 hours), emitting gamma-quanta with energies of 1.37 and 2.75 MeV. In the process of measurements, these gamma-quanta belong to the spectrum measured. As a result, the form of the obtained spectrum depends on the time of measurements. If the process of measurements takes less than the half-life period (as in our case we have), the contribution of these lines occurs to be minor, and in long-term many-hour measurements an equilibrium distribution is established, wherein the intensity of these lines rises sharply. - Titanium (see Fig. 7 and Fig. 8). For titanium very significant discrepancies are observed between the calculations and the experiments. In the calculated spectra only one 0.511 MeV line of positron annihilation is seen. The presence of this line in all the samples is due to the effect of positron annihilation. The rest part of the calculated spectra is presented by continuous distribution, while the experiment gives complex spectra form with the lines at 0.889, 0.983, 1.438, and 2.315 MeV. These lines are well-known from the Atlas [2]. The total amount of photons in the ENDF/B-6 calculation is nearly two times greater than that in the experiment. - Iron (see Fig. 9 and Fig. 10). Iron is the most studied element. However, there are also discrepancies for iron but they are not such large as for other elements. The total amount of photons in the calculations and experiments differ insignificantly (within 10%). - Copper (Fig. 11). Our experimental data for copper are significantly differ from the calculated ones. It seems that there are no reliable experimental data for this element at all. - Zirconium (Fig. 12 and Fig. 13). Unfortunately, the ENDF/B6 version available for us has no data on the gamma- production for zirconium. Besides the base 2.188 MeV line and the 0.511 MeV line common to all elements, the zirconium experimental spectra have one twin line at 0.912 and 0.935 MeV, not separating in our experiments. In the ENDL-92 calculation these lines are not present. At the same time the continuous component of spectrum in the calculation is much overestimated. The total amount of photons in the calculation with ENDL-92 is 24% higher than that in the experiment. The total photons energy in the experiments and calculations agree nearly due to the difference in the spectra from. - Lead (Fig. 14 and Fig. 15). The experimental photon spectrum from lead agrees well with the ENDF/B6 calculations throughout the whole energy range. The calculation ignores the experimental line close to 2.2 MeV. - Uranium-238 (Fig. 16 and Fig. 17). The calculated gamma-spectrum of uranium is distinct not very significantly from the experimental one. In the experiment, a certain structure is outlined in the form of lines at 0.5, 1.2, 2.3, and 4.4 MeV. The last two peaks are probably connected with the experimental configuration and the scattered background (capture of slow neutrons by hydrogen of concrete walls and inelastic scattering 14-MeV neutrons in polyethylene). Summarizing the analysis of the results, it is possible to say that there is significant difference in gamma-production of the calculations and the experiments even for the most common elements, and the accepted systems of nuclear data should be appropriately updated. Besides, it should be noted that the studies conducted refer only to the energy region of incident neutrons close to 14 MeV. The region of intermediate neutron energies 5-14 MeV is still unstudied, and it is possible to suppose that the discrepancies between the calculations and experiments in this range will be even greater. The problem of correlation between total neutron cross-section and gamma-production cross-section still remains unclear. If such correlation exists, the functions of photon leakage depending on the neutron energy may be very complicated (according to the structure of full cross-sections). Therefore, the extrapolation of data on photon-production into unstudied region of neutron energies will be unreliable. It is necessary to conduct experiments on gamma-leakage for neutron energies ranging from 5 to 10 MeV. 6. Special Features of the Experiment: ---------------------------------- Method of generalized differentiation with semi-empirically determined coefficients for transferring apparatus electron-recoil spectra into energy spectra. 7. Author/Organizer ---------------- Experiment and analysis: A.I. Saukov, V.D. Lyutov, E.N. Lipilina RFNC-VNIITF (Zababakhin Russian Federal Nuclear Center – All-Russian Scientific Researching Institute of Technical Physics) Vasiliev Street 13, P.O. Box 245 Snezhinsk Chelyabinsk Region 456770 Russia Compiler of data for SINBAD: Elena N.Lipilina RFNC-VNIITF Reviewer of compiled data: I. Kodeli OECD/NEA, 12 bd des Iles, 92130 Issy les Moulineaux, France 8. Availability: ------------ Unrestricted 9. References: ---------- [1] A.I. Saukov, B.I. Sukhanov, V.D. Lyutov, et al, "Proton Leakage from Spherical and Hemispherical Samples with a Central 14MeV Neutron Source", Nucl.Sci.Eng., V.142, No.2, p.158, 2002 [2] M.R. Ahmed, A.M. Demidov, et al, "Atlas of gamma-ray spectra from the inelastic scattering of reactor fast neutrons", Moscow, Atomizdat, 1978 [3] A. I. Saukov, E. N. Lipilina, V. D. Lyutov , "Measurements of Neutron and Photon Leakage from Spherical and Hemispherical Samples with a Central 14-MeV Neutron Source as a Possible Type of Benchmarks", presented at the Int. Conf. on Radiation Safety, ICRS10 – RPS-2004, May 9-14, 2004, Madeira, Portugal 10. Data and format: 10. Data and format: Description of detailed files No. Filename Size(byte) Contents --------------------------------------------------------- 1 rfnc_ph.htm 19630 This information file 2 MCNP5.inp 1696 Input data for the MCNP5 calculation 3 fig1exp.jpg 40098 Fig. 1. Geometry of experiment 4 fig2mishen.jpg 48960 Fig. 2. Design of the target unit 5 fig3na22.jpg 25895 Fig. 3. Gamma-spectrum of Na-22 specimen 6 fig4na24.jpg 23682 Fig. 4. Gamma-spectrum of Na -24 specimen 7 fig5alsp.jpg 45547 Fig. 5. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Al sphere 8 fig6alhs.jpg 46422 Fig. 6. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Al hemisphere 9 fig7tisp.jpg 47585 Fig. 7. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Ti sphere 10 fig8tihs.jpg 45727 Fig. 8. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Ti hemisphere 11 fig9fesp.jpg 45593 Fig. 9. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Fe sphere 12 fig10fehs.jpg 47799 Fig. 10. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Fe hemisphere 13 fig11cusp.jpg 47492 Fig. 11. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Cu sphere 14 fig12zrsp.jpg 43297 Fig. 12. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Zr sphere 15 fig13zrhs.jpg 43534 Fig. 13. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Zr hemisphere 16 fig14pbsp.jpg 47513 Fig. 14. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Pb sphere 17 fig15pbhs.jpg 50146 Fig. 15. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from Pb hemisphere 18 fig16u8sp.jpg 43560 Fig. 16. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from U-238 sphere 19 fig17u8hs.jpg 49637 Fig. 17. Calculated and experimental spectra of photon yield from U-238 hemisphere 20 tab1samples.txt 163 Table 1. Parameters of samples used 21 tab2leakage.txt 192 Table 2. Total neutron yield from used samples per one neutron of a 14 MeV source 22 tab3result.txt 12488 Table 3. Results of measurements 23 tab3result.xls 31744 Table 3. Results of measurements 24 mad_rep.pdf 260641 Reference 3 SINBAD Benchmark Generation Date: 09/2005 SINBAD Benchmark Last Update: 03/2006