The NEA Committee on Radiological Protection and Public Health (CRPPH) Expert Group on a Post-Accident Food Safety Framework (EGFSF) recommends establishing a mechanism to independently validate food monitoring and trade controls following a nuclear or radiological accident. Based on scientific review, this approach aims to support long-term trade, rebuild consumer trust in the food supply chain, and integrate into existing international guidance. Lessons from past accidents such as Chernobyl and Fukushima highlight that insufficient harmonisation and lack of independent evaluation can lead to confusion, public health concerns, and trade disputes.
To address these challenges, the EGFSF proposes a structured scientific review mechanism involving standardised sampling and testing, expert panel evaluations, and transparent communication of results and decisions. The adoption of the EGFSF's recommendations through an international legal framework could improve the management of food and trade in food following a nuclear or radiological accident. Such an approach would enhance confidence in food safety decisions, promote consistency for stakeholders, and strengthen international trade, ultimately contributing to a safer and more reliable post-accident food supply chain.