%%% Everything to right from '%' is a comment; does not show in the final pdf fie and can be deleted. %%% DO NOT EDIT the following section enclosed by ***** %%% *************************************************** \documentclass[twocolumn,amsmath,amssymb,10pt,superscriptaddress,a4paper,letterpaper,fleqn]{revtex4-1} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{epsfig} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{dcolumn} \usepackage{array} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{fancyheadings} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage{multirow} \usepackage{float} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage{afterpage} \usepackage{color} \bibliographystyle{ieeetr.bst} \setlongtables \usepackage[breaklinks=true,linkbordercolor={1 1 1}]{hyperref} \parskip 0pc \textwidth=18cm \setcounter{secnumdepth}{5} \def\etal{et al.\,} %DO NOT REMOVE THE FOLLOWING LINE %RND2013 1 \begin{document}\setcounter{page}{1} %%% ********************************************************************** \title{ %% Please do not remove the line below \qquad \\ \qquad \\ \qquad \\ \qquad \\ \qquad \\ \qquad \\ %% Change title, authors, afiliation and type your abstract Neutron reaction on XXX under the CIELO Collaboration \\ % Neutron Reactions on % $^{1}$H, $^{16}$O, $^{56}$Fe, $^{235,238}$U, and $^{239}$Pu % ~ \\ \vskip0.2in } \author{author} \email[Corresponding author: ]{email@} \affiliation{Lab address} \date{\today} %\received{8 March 2013; revised received XX June 2013; accepted XX September 2013} \begin{abstract} Abstract. {\bf Note we do not yet know page restrictions for these individual CIELO papers, but plan for somewhere between 4-10 pages each. (The same ND2018 issue will have a large 100+ paper on ENDF/B-VIII, and a large 30+ page paper on new standards). Thus we expect perhaps 150 pages reserved for separate CIELO papers.} \end{abstract} \maketitle % \clearpage % \tableofcontents %%% DO NOT EDIT the following section enclosed by ***** %%% *************************************************** \lhead{The CIELO Collaboration $\dots$} \chead{NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS} \rhead{M.B. Chadwick} \lfoot{} \rfoot{} \renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0.4pt} %%% *************************************************** %%% EDIT: the body of your text starts here, you may use as many \section, \subsection, \subsubsection %%% \begin{figure}, \begin{tabular} and \begin{equations} as needed. Please note that each \begin{} %%% must be closed with the corresponding \end{} and that section titles should be in capital %%% letters. Current text should be eventually deleted. \section{INTRODUCTION} \label{sec:introduction} {\bf The paper should be journal quality; it will be peer reviewed}. {\bf Give background, e.g.} - The CIELO pilot project was commissioned by the OECD's Nuclear Energy Agency WPEC (Working Party on International Nuclear Data Evaluation Co-operation) during a meeting held in May 2012. The goal has been to identify deficiencies and discrepancies in our current understanding of neutron reactions on high priority nuclides ${^1}$H, $^{16}$O, $^{56}$Fe, $^{235}$U, $^{238}$U and $^{239}$Pu, and to develop proposed solutions and improvements in our understanding. The goals of CIELO are documented in Ref.~\cite{Chadwick2014}. This reference, together with other papers such as Refs.~\cite{IAEA2012,Bauge2012,Salvatores2014} document some of the questions being addressed. {\bf Explain clearly which isotope and cross sections or energy/angle distributions will be addressed.} {\bf Explain the background as to why our previous understanding was inadequate. Why - a lack of accurate experimental data? Insufficiently reliable model predictions? What were the assessed uncertainties prior to the present work?} {\bf Possibly summarize the applications that have motivated the work}. \section{RESULTS} \label{sec:results} {\bf Explain the basis for your new conclusions - new experiments made, theory, new analyses?} {\bf What are your new proposed uncertainties?} {\bf Proposed or recommended evalations should} (a) provide a ENDF-formatted file that can be archived on the NEA CIELO web site; and (b) be documented in this paper, with illustrative figures that compare the recommendation against the main evaluated data libraries, such a ENDF/B-VII.1 \cite{Chadwick2011,Kahler2011}, JEFF-3.1 \cite{Koning2006,Koning2013}, JENDL-4.0 \cite{Shibata2011}, BROND/ROSFOND \cite{Zabrodskaya2007}, and CENDL-3.1 \cite{Ge2011}. % \begin{figure} % \begin{center} % \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{mbc_endf_critcalcs.eps}} % % \resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{HMF28_C2mbc.eps}} % \end{center} % \caption{Calculated/measured root mean square deviation (in \%) from unity for % nuclear criticality, $k_{\mathrm{eff}}$, for a suite of 119 critical assemblies, % as a function of ENDF library version number.} % \label{fig:rmskeff} % \end{figure} {\bf What are remaining open questions that remain unsolved?.} \begin{thebibliography}{999} \bibitem{Chadwick2014} M. B. Chadwick {\it et al.}, {\sc Nucl. Data Sheets} {\bf 118}, 1 (2014). \bibitem{IAEA2012} A. Plompen {\it et al.}, IAEA report INDC(NDS)-0597 (2012). \bibitem{Bauge2012} E. Bauge {\it et al.}, {\sc Eur. Phys. J. } A {\bf 48}, 113 (2012). \bibitem{Salvatores2014} M. Salvatores, {\it et al.}, %NUCL. DATA SHEETS (2013, submitted). {\sc Nucl. Data Sheets} {\bf 115}, xxx (2014). \bibitem{Chadwick2011} M. B. Chadwick {\it et al.}, {\sc Nucl. Data Sheets} {\bf 112}, 2887 (2011). \bibitem{Kahler2011} A. Kahler {\it et al.}, {\sc Nucl. Data Sheets} {\bf 112}, 2997 (2011). \bibitem{Koning2006} A.J. Koning {\it et al.}, JEFF Report {\bf 21}, NEA (2006). \bibitem{Koning2013} A.J. Koning {\it et al.}, JEFF Report {\bf 23}, NEA (2013). \bibitem{Shibata2011} K. Shibata {\it et al.}, {\sc J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. } {\bf 48}, 1 (2011). \bibitem{Zabrodskaya2007} S.V. Zabrodskaya, {\it et al.}, {\sc Nucl. Const.} {\bf 1-2}, 3 (2007). \bibitem{Ge2011} Z.G. Ge {\it et al.}, {\sc J. Korean Phys. Soc.} {\bf 59}, No. 2, 1052 (2011). \end{thebibliography} \newpage \section{Appendix - Possible CIELO NDS papers?} First, the big ENDF/B-VIII paper will include many co-authors who contributed CIELO work that was adopted for ENDF/B-VIII. The big ENDF/B-VIII paper will fully document the new evaluation, reasons for evaluation choices, and how B-VIII compares to B-VII.1 and other evaluations. Many co-authors of this paper will not want to write separate CIELO papers - {\bf we certaintly do not want to be duplicative.} But some co-authors will reasonably want to have additional CIELO papers, because (a) they may want to go into more detail there; (b) there may be work they have done that was not adopted in VIII, and it should be documented still for CIELO; and (c) they may want first-author credit for what they have done. I am aware of the following possible separate CIELO papers for NDS January 2018, and I will refine this list over the coming months, with CIELO collaborators and with the NDS editor, Pavel Oblozinsky (many people listed below have not yet affirmed their interest/willingness; and there will be additions to this list). \begin{itemize} \item{Chadwick - short overview of CIELO SG40 objectives and accomplishments} \item{Hale et al - 16O evaluation ?} \item{Hale, Kunieda, Livermore collaborators, ... Broader O16 collaboration conclusions on magitude of n,a based on unitarity} \item{Georginis, Plompen et al - conclusions on 16O (n,a) corrections on historic data} \item{Plompen et al, the low energy 16O total elastic cross section} \item{Leal? - his R-matrix 16O evaluation (not in B-VIII)} \item{Herman et al - BNL staff - more details on 56Fe in fast region?} \item{Trkov et al - resonance region of 56Fe} \item{Leal et al - new resonance analysis of 56Fe} \item{Chinese work on 56Fe - eg inelastic scattering evaluation} \item{Romain, Morillon, Bauge et al - CEA fast actinide evaluations} \item{Chinese work on 235U} \item{M.Pigni et al (Trkov) resonance analysis of 235U} \item{R. Capote et al, fast 235U and 238U analysis} \item{L. Leal resonance analysis of 235U} \item{Schillebeeckx et al., new Geel 238U resonance analysis - MBC notes not yet in B-VIII-beta1} \item{Kawano - 238U and LANSCE capture theory and moel calculations} \item{Neudecker - PFNS evaluations of actinides - incl those that did not make it into B-VIII, eg thermal 239Pu} \item{Talou - multiplicity dependent fission neutrons and gamma-rays} \item{Kawano, Capote, Romain, et al, latest conclusions on actinide inelastic cross sections} \end{itemize} \end{document}