From: Aliberti, Gerardo [mailto:aliberti@anl.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:46 PM
To: Sandro Pelloni; SALVATORES Massimo 090089; Giuseppe Palmiotti; DUPONT Emmeric, NEA/DB
Cc: McKnight, Richard D.
Subject: RE: Updated Chapter 4: Quick look of new results and status

All,

As anticipated, I'm sending the ANL results after recalculating spectral index sensitivities
with the use of core (shielded) cross sections for the detectors.
Unfortunately, at the moment I do not have the uncertainties of the target systems after adjustment
and a major shutdown is going to occur at ANL during the week-end. As consequence, I'll be able to
get these last results only next week (most likely on Monday).

So, in summary, the attached file contains all ANL updated results requested by the subgroup except
for the file "Uncertainties_Target_Systems_ANL.txt" which will be finalized on Monday.
You may start to upload the new results (again, except for "Uncertainties_Target_Systems_ANL.txt")
in case you are in a hurry for the deliverable, or you may wait till Monday when I will resend
everything with "Uncertainties_Target_Systems_ANL.txt" also finalized.

Thanks,
Gerardo

-----------------------------------------------------------
From: Aliberti, Gerardo [mailto:aliberti@anl.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 1:56 PM
To: DUPONT Emmeric, NEA/DB; Giuseppe Palmiotti (pinopalm@sbcglobal.net); wpec-sg33@oecd-nea.org
Subject: Subgroup33 files

Dear Emmeric and Pino,

Please, see in attachment the files containing the ANL cross section adjustment results
in the format requested by the subgroup.

The following comments/remarks should be considered:

All files containing the sensitivity results are the same we already delivered last May, except for:
ZPPR9_VOID_Step3_Sens_Coef.ANL
ZPPR9_VOID_Step5_Sens_Coef.ANL
In these two cases, in fact, there was an error on the mubar sensitivities.

The following files:
integral_correl.INL
Nuclear.Data.INL.ENDF7.0
Nuclear.Data.Correl.INL.COMMARA.2.0
where taken from the INL results already uploaded on the web site, because for the adjustment
we used the same correlations (both experimental and calculated) that were used by INL.
Then, we also used the same cross section values and covariance data (COMMARA-2.0)
before cross section adjustment.

Thanks,
Gerardo and Dick