ENTRY O1274 20051002 SUBENT O1274001 20051002 BIB 14 46 TITLE Experimental study and nuclear model calculations on the Os-192(p,n)Ir-192 reaction. Comparison of reactor and cyclotron production of the therapeutic radionuclide Ir-192. AUTHOR (K.Hilgers, S.Sudar, S.M.Qaim) INSTITUTE (2GERJUL) REFERENCE (J,ARI,63,93,2005) HISTORY (20050513C) (20051002U) Last checking has been done. SAMPLE Thin osmium samples were prepared by electrolytic deposition of the enriched Os-192 on 25-mum Ni-foils (99.9% pure) chemical purityof used osmium- 99.9%. Isotopic composition: 84.5% Os-192, 15.2% Os-190, 0.3% Os-189, the electrolytic deposit of metallic osmium had a mass between 1 and 4 mg, which was determined by weighing. The uniformity of the deposit was checked using a microscope. Also the absence of all oxides, which are coloured, could be confirmed. A check via proton activation analysis was done, too. ADD-RES (TTY-C) The integrated yield of Ir-192 was calculated , assuming a 1 hour irradiation with a proton beam of 1 microA. (COMP) The model codes ALICE-IPPE and EMPIRE-II. A comparison of the reactor and cyclotron production methods is given too. DETECTOR (HPGE) MONITOR (22-TI-0(P,X)23-V-48,,SIG) (29-CU-0(P,X)30-ZN-65,,SIG) MONIT-REF (,F.TARKANYI+,R,IAEA-TECDOC-1211,49,2001) FACILITY (CYCLO,2GERJUL) The compact cyclotron CV-28. METHOD (STTA) (CHSEP) (ACTIV) ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Total uncertainty in measured cross section. The uncertainty is result of: 1. Uncertainty in decay data (1%). 2. Uncertainty in cross section of monitor reaction (8-10%). 3. Uncertainty in peak area measurement (2-5%). 4. Uncertainty in efficiency of the detector (4-6%). 5. Uncertainty in target uniformity (3-5%). 6. Uncertainty in number of target nuclei (2-5%). STATUS (TABLE) ENDBIB 46 NOCOMMON ENDSUBENT 49