ENTRY A0452 20021218 SUBENT A0452001 20021218 BIB 10 66 TITLE Preequilibrium emission in alpha induced reactions on bromine and thallium AUTHOR (N.P.M.Sathik, M.Afzal Ansari, B.P.Singh, M.Ismail, M.H.Rashid) REFERENCE (J,PR/C,66,014602,2002) INSTITUTE (3INDMUA) Department of physics (3INDVEC) SAMPLE Targets of KBr and TlCl of thicknesses 1.5 and 3.52 mg/cm**2 , respectively, were prepared by a special vacuum evaporation technique because of the hygroscopic nature of these compounds. These targets were deposited on aluminum backings of uniform thickness of 6.75 mg/cm**2 , placed over a rectangular masking plate. A thin aluminum layer of thickness 25 mg/cm**2 was further deposited by vacuum evaporation onto the upper surface of the prepared targets, so that the moisture would not affect the surface of these targets. METHOD (STTA) See sample aluminum foils of different thicknesses were also interspersed as energy degraders in order to get the desired alpha-particle energy on different targets. (ACTIV) A stack of KBr and TlCl comprised of eight targets each was irradiated at 50 MeV for 3 hours. Moreover, stacks of KBr comprised of six foils and of TlCl having two foils were irradiated at 30 and 25 MeV, respectively, for 3 hours each. (BCINT) (GSPEC) DETECTOR (GELI) FACILITY (ISOCY,3INDVEC) HISTORY (20021202C) (20021218R) Corrected data table is received from m. Afzal ansari. (20021218U) Last checking has been done. ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) The uncertainty in the detector efficiency due to the statistical errors of counting, is estimated to be <1%. Since the irradiated targets were not point sources, the uncertainties due to a solid angle are estimated and is found to be <5%. The total uncertainty in the efficiency is estimated to be <6.5%. The uncertainty due to flux variation is estimated to be <4%. In order to minimize the errors due to the dead time, particularly for the cases where the activity in the irradiated samples was large, the sample-detector distance was suitably adjusted to keep the dead time <10%. However, the corrections were applied in the counting rates accordingly. The errors in the estimation of number of target nuclei were analyzed and are estimated to be <1%. To avoid the uncertainty due to the recoiling of nuclei out of the sample, the targets were placed perpendicular to the incident beam such that sample deposition faced the incident beam. As such, the recoiling nuclei are likely to be trapped in the aluminum backing; hence, no correction is applied for that. As the beam traverses the stack materials, low-energy neutrons may be released which in turn may disturb the yield. However, it was indicated that such disturbing yields are negligible. The overall error due to all these factors mentioned above is expected to be <12%. The overall errors including the statistical errors in counting and are generally <20% except for few points. These errors do not include the uncertainty of the nuclear data such as the branching ratio, the decay constants, etc (EN-ERR) Noany information is presented. ENDBIB 66 NOCOMMON ENDSUBENT 69