Request ID | 116 | Type of the request | Request to be checked | ||
Target | Reaction and process | Incident Energy | Secondary energy or angle | Target uncertainty | Covariance |
3-LI-0 | (d,x)Be-7 SIG | 10 MeV-40 MeV | 10 | Y | |
Field | Subfield | Date Request created | Date Request accepted | Ongoing action | |
Fusion | DONES, IFMIF | 31-MAY-21 | Y |
Requester: Dr Stanislav SIMAKOV at KARLSRUHE, GER
Email: stanislav.simakov@partner.kit.edu
Project (context): Fusion (DONES, IFMIF) and Accelerator driven neutron sources (e.g., SARAF-II)
Impact: The Li(d,x)7Be reactions will produce 100% of radioactive isotope 7Be in the IFMIF Li loop [1]. Consequently the accuracy of the Li(d,x)7Be cross sections will solely impact on the efficiency, design and cost of the IFMIF radio-protection measures which should guarantee the safe accumulation of 7Be in the lithium loop Heat Exchanger and cold inventory traps [2,3]. [1] S. Simakov et al., “Assessment of the 3H and 7Be generation in the IFMIF lithium loop”, J. Nucl. Mat. 329 (2004) 213
Accuracy: Uncertainties below 10% as a reasonable compromise between application needs and what is practically achievable using standard techniques.
Justification document: In the requested deuteron energy range from 10 MeV to 40 MeV (the latter is DONES working energy) there are no experimental data for the 6,7Li(d,x)7Be reaction cross sections. Moreover, the evaluated major deuteron libraries (ENDF, JEFF, FENDL, TENDL) including the just-released JENDL/DEU disagree from the existing measurements below 10 MeV. More details on the status of the cross section data are available in the following documents:
Comment from requester:
Review comment:
Entry Status:
Main references: Additional file attached:Simakov_EGHPRL_2021May.pdf
Requester: Dr Stanislav SIMAKOV at KARLSRUHE, GER
Project (context): Fusion (DONES, IFMIF) and Accelerator driven neutron sources (e.g., SARAF-II)
Impact: The Li(d,x)t reactions will produce 80% of tritium in the IFMIF Li loop [1]. Consequently the accuracy of the Li(d,x)t cross section will impact on the efficiency, design and cost of the planned IFMIF radio-protection measures such as replacement of the yttrium and cold traps for the long tritium retaining, prevention of its permeation in atmosphere, etc. [2,3]. [1] S. Simakov et al., “Assessment of the 3H and 7Be generation in the IFMIF lithium loop”, J. Nucl. Mat. 329 (2004) 213
Accuracy: Uncertainties below 10% as a reasonable compromise between application needs and what is practically achievable using standard techniques.
Justification document: At the requested deuteron energies from 5 MeV up to 40 MeV there are no experimental data for the 6,7Li(d,x)t reaction cross sections; whereas Tritium TTY was measured only once at 40 MeV. The evaluated major deuteron libraries (ENDF, JEFF, FENDL, TENDL) including just released JENDL/DEU disagree with known measurements by a factor 2-3. More details on the status of cross sections and TTY are available in the following documents:
Comment from requester: In the case of the tritium spectroscopy experiments, the tritium double-differential data (DDX) for reaction (d,x)H-3 are desirable to measure in the maximum t-energy range and for the representative emission angles to allow integration of DDX and thus obtaining the production cross section σ(d,x)t. However, an activation experiment measuring tritium by its decay or by other direct means is sufficient.
Review comment:
Entry Status:
Main references: Additional file attached:Simakov_EGHPRL_2021May.pdf
[2] A. Ibarra et al., “The European approach to the fusion-like neutron source: the IFMIF-DONES project”, Nuclear Fusion 59 (2019) 065002
[3] F. Martín-Fuertes et al., “Integration of Safety in IFMIF-DONES Design”, Safety 5 (2019) 74
S. Simakov et al., “Status and benchmarking of the deuteron induced Tritium and Beryllium-7 production cross sections in Lithium”, KIT Scientific Working Papers 147, KIT, June 2020; EFFDOC-1438, JEFF Meetings, NEA, November 2020; Presentation at EG HRPL, WPEC Meetings, NEA, 12 May 2021 (see attached file below).
Work in progress (as of SG-C review of May 2021)
Please report any missing information to hprlinfo@oecd-nea.org
Additional file attached:
Request ID 117
Type of the request Request to be checked
Target Reaction and process Incident Energy Secondary energy or angle Target uncertainty Covariance
3-LI-0 (d,x)H-3 SIG,TTY 5 MeV-40 MeV 10 Y
Field Subfield Date Request created Date Request accepted Ongoing action
Fusion DONES, IFMIF 31-MAY-21 Y
Email: stanislav.simakov@partner.kit.edu
[2] A. Ibarra et al., “The European approach to the fusion-like neutron source: the IFMIF-DONES project”, Nuclear Fusion 59 (2019) 065002
[3] F. Martín-Fuertes et al., “Integration of Safety in IFMIF-DONES Design”, Safety 5 (2019) 74
S. Simakov et al., “Status and benchmarking of the deuteron induced Tritium and Beryllium-7 production cross sections in Lithium”, KIT Scientific Working Papers 147, KIT, June 2020; EFFDOC-1438, JEFF Meetings, NEA, November 2020; Presentation at EG HRPL, WPEC Meetings, NEA, 12 May 2021 (see attached file below).
Work in progress (as of SG-C review of May 2021)
Please report any missing information to hprlinfo@oecd-nea.org
Additional file attached: