IRDFF project
Impact:
The International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File (IRDFF) aims at providing evaluated neutron dosimetry reactions validated for all applications related to fission reactors and fusion technology development [IAEA2017].
Accuracy:
2%-5%
Justification document:
Accurate cross sections as well as spectrum-averaged cross sections (SACS) in relevant and well-characterized neutron fields are essential for improvement and validation of the evaluated data [Simakov2017].
Comment from requester:
Measurements of the spectrum-averaged cross section are missing for validation purposes.
References
- [IAEA2017] IAEA CRP on Testing and Improving the International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File (IRDFF),
http://www-nds.iaea.org/IRDFFtest/.
- [Simakov2017] S. Simakov, et al., “Proposals for new measurements for IRDFF community and HPRL”, September 2017.
Review comment:
Entry Status:
Work in progress (as of SG-C review of May 2018)
Main references:
Please report any missing information to hprlinfo@oecd-nea.org
Theory/Evaluation
Additional file attached:Simakov2017.pdf
Additional file attached:
Request ID | 50 |
Type of the request | Special Purpose Quantity |
Target | Reaction and process | Incident Energy | Secondary energy or angle | Target uncertainty | Covariance |
28-NI-60 | (n,p) SIG,SPA | 252Cf(sf) | | 2-5 | Y |
Field | Subfield | Date Request created | Date Request accepted | Ongoing action |
Dosimetry | Fast fission, D-T fusion | 06-OCT-17 | 06-OCT-17 | |
Requester: Dr Stanislav SIMAKOV at KARLSRUHE, GER
Email: stanislav.simakov@partner.kit.edu
Project (context): IRDFF project
Impact:
The International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File (IRDFF) aims at providing evaluated neutron dosimetry reactions validated for all applications related to fission reactors and fusion technology development [IAEA2017].
Accuracy:
2%-5%
Justification document:
Accurate cross sections as well as spectrum-averaged cross sections (SACS) in relevant and well-characterized neutron fields are essential for improvement and validation of the evaluated data [Simakov2017].
Comment from requester:
New measurements of the spectrum-averaged cross section are requested to solve C/E discrepancy. See SPA_CE_Cf252.pdf below.
References
- [IAEA2017] IAEA CRP on Testing and Improving the International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File (IRDFF),
http://www-nds.iaea.org/IRDFFtest/.
- [Simakov2017] S. Simakov, et al., “Proposals for new measurements for IRDFF community and HPRL”, September 2017.
Review comment:
Entry Status:
Work in progress (as of SG-C review of May 2018)
Main references:
Please report any missing information to hprlinfo@oecd-nea.org
Experiments
Theory/Evaluation
Additional file attached:Simakov2017.pdf
Additional file attached:SPA_CE_Cf252.pdf
Request ID | 64 |
Type of the request | Special Purpose Quantity |
Target | Reaction and process | Incident Energy | Secondary energy or angle | Target uncertainty | Covariance |
15-P-31 | (n,p) SIG,SPA | 252Cf(sf)-235U(n,f) | | 2-5 | Y |
Field | Subfield | Date Request created | Date Request accepted | Ongoing action |
Dosimetry | Fast fission, D-T fusion | 06-OCT-17 | 06-OCT-17 | |
Requester: Dr Stanislav SIMAKOV at KARLSRUHE, GER
Email: stanislav.simakov@partner.kit.edu
Project (context): IRDFF project
Impact:
The International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File (IRDFF) aims at providing evaluated neutron dosimetry reactions validated for all applications related to fission reactors and fusion technology development [IAEA2017].
Accuracy:
2%-5%
Justification document:
Accurate cross sections as well as spectrum-averaged cross sections (SACS) in relevant and well-characterized neutron fields are essential for improvement and validation of the evaluated data [Simakov2017].
Comment from requester:
Measurements of the 252Cf(sf)-spectrum-averaged cross section are missing for validation purposes. New measurements of the 235U(n,f)-spectrum-averaged cross section are requested to solve C/E discrepancy. See SPA_CE_Cf252U235.pdf below.
References
- [IAEA2017] IAEA CRP on Testing and Improving the International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File (IRDFF),
http://www-nds.iaea.org/IRDFFtest/.
- [Simakov2017] S. Simakov, et al., “Proposals for new measurements for IRDFF community and HPRL”, September 2017.
Review comment:
Entry Status:
Work in progress (as of SG-C review of May 2018)
Main references:
Please report any missing information to hprlinfo@oecd-nea.org
Theory/Evaluation
Additional file attached:Simakov2017.pdf
Additional file attached:SPA_CE_Cf252U235.pdf
Request ID | 82 |
Type of the request | Special Purpose Quantity |
Target | Reaction and process | Incident Energy | Secondary energy or angle | Target uncertainty | Covariance |
39-Y-89 | (n,p) SIG | 15 MeV-100 MeV | | 5-10 | Y |
Field | Subfield | Date Request created | Date Request accepted | Ongoing action |
Dosimetry | High-energy | 06-OCT-17 | 06-OCT-17 | |
Requester: Dr Stanislav SIMAKOV at KARLSRUHE, GER
Email: stanislav.simakov@partner.kit.edu
Project (context): IRDFF project
Impact:
The International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File (IRDFF) aims at providing evaluated neutron dosimetry reactions validated for all applications related to fission reactors and fusion technology development [IAEA2017].
Accuracy:
5%-10%
Justification document:
Accurate cross sections as well as spectrum-averaged cross sections (SACS) in relevant and well-characterized neutron fields are essential for improvement and validation of the evaluated data [Simakov2017].
Comment from requester:
The IRDFF project strives to evaluate, and eventually add to the library, high-threshold reactions with cross section plateaus located between 15/20 MeV and 100/150 MeV to meet the requirements of the accelerator-driven high-energy neutron sources. Note that it is important to know the cross section tail up to 100/150 MeV in order to allow the deconvolution of high-energy quasi-monoenergetic neutron source spectra.
References
- [IAEA2017] IAEA CRP on Testing and Improving the International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File (IRDFF),
http://www-nds.iaea.org/IRDFFtest/.
- [Simakov2017] S. Simakov, et al., “Proposals for new measurements for IRDFF community and HPRL”, September 2017.
Review comment:
Entry Status:
Work in progress (as of SG-C review of May 2018)
Main references:
Please report any missing information to hprlinfo@oecd-nea.org
Additional file attached:Simakov2017.pdf
Additional file attached:Y89(n,xn).pdf