Request ID | 29 | Type of the request | High Priority request | ||
Target | Reaction and process | Incident Energy | Secondary energy or angle | Target uncertainty | Covariance |
11-NA-23 | (n,inl) SIG | 0.5 MeV-1.3 MeV | Emis spec. | See details | Y |
Field | Subfield | Date Request created | Date Request accepted | Ongoing action | |
Fission | Fast Reactors (SFR) | 04-APR-08 | 12-SEP-08 | Y |
Requester: Prof. Massimo SALVATORES at CADARACHE, FR
Email: massimo.salvatores@cea.fr
Project (context): NEA WPEC Subgroup 26
Impact:
Accuracy:
Justification document:
Comment from requester:
Review comment:
Entry Status:
Main references: Experiments Theory/Evaluation Validation Additional file attached:SG26-report.html
Requester: Dr Stanislav SIMAKOV at KARLSRUHE, GER
Project (context): IRDFF project
Impact:
Accuracy:
Justification document:
Comment from requester: References
Review comment:
Entry Status:
Main references: Experiments Theory/Evaluation Additional file attached:Simakov2017.pdf
Design phases of selected reactor and fuel cycle concepts require improved data and methods in order to reduce margins for both economical and safety reasons. A first indicative nuclear data target accuracy assessment was made within WPEC Subgroup 26 (SG-26). The assessment indicated a list of nuclear data priorities for each of the systems considered (ABTR, SFR, EPR, GFR, LFR, ADMAB, VHTR, EPR). These nuclear data priorities should all be addressed to meet target accuracy requirements for the integral parameters characterizing those systems (see the accompanying requests originating from SG-26).
Requested accuracy is required to meet target accuracy for void coefficient for the Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor in a TRU burning configuration, i.e., with a Conversion Ratio CR<1 (SFR). Details are provided in the OECD/NEA WPEC Subgroup 26 Final Report: "Uncertainty and Target Accuracy Assessment for Innovative Systems Using Recent Covariance Data Evaluations" (link to WPEC Subgroup 26 Report in PDF format, 6 Mb).
Target accuracies are specified per system and per energy group when they are not met by the BOLNA estimate of the current (initial) uncertainties.
Energy Range Target versus initial uncertainties (%) Initial ABTR SFR EFR
1.35 - 2.23 MeV 13 9 0.498 - 1.35 MeV 28 10 4 8
OECD/NEA WPEC Subgroup 26 Final Report: "Uncertainty and Target Accuracy Assessment for Innovative Systems Using Recent Covariance Data Evaluations" (link to WPEC Subgroup 26 Report in PDF format, 6 Mb).
Given the present state of knowledge the above target accuracies are very tight. However, any attempt that significantly contributes to reducing the present accuracy for this quantity is strongly encouraged. Any such attempt will significantly enhance the accuracy with which reactor integral parameters may be estimated and will therefore impact economic and safety margins.
Work in progress (as of SG-C review of May 2018)
Pending new evaluation or validation (as of SG-C review of June 2019)
Please report any missing information to hprlinfo@oecd-nea.org
Additional file attached:
Request ID 69
Type of the request Special Purpose Quantity
Target Reaction and process Incident Energy Secondary energy or angle Target uncertainty Covariance
11-NA-23 (n,2n) SIG,SPA 252Cf(sf)-235U(n,f) 2-5 Y
Field Subfield Date Request created Date Request accepted Ongoing action
Dosimetry D-T fusion 06-OCT-17 06-OCT-17
Email: stanislav.simakov@partner.kit.edu
The International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File (IRDFF) aims at providing evaluated neutron dosimetry reactions validated for all applications related to fission reactors and fusion technology development [IAEA2017].
2%-5%
Accurate cross sections as well as spectrum-averaged cross sections (SACS) in relevant and well-characterized neutron fields are essential for improvement and validation of the evaluated data [Simakov2017].
Following a recommendation from the IAEA Data Development Project on Neutron Standards [Pronyaev2013], the IRDFF project supports SACS measurements of high-threshold (above 10 MeV) dosimetry cross-sections in well-characterized 252Cf(sf) and 235U(nth,f) neutron fields in order to improve the cross sections and/or the high-energy part of the prompt fission neutron spectra.
Measurements of the spectrum-averaged cross section are missing for validation purposes and for improvement of the cross section and prompt fission neutron spectrum above 10 MeV. See Cf252U235_HighThreshold.pdf below.
http://www-nds.iaea.org/IRDFFtest/.
Work in progress (as of SG-C review of May 2018)
Please report any missing information to hprlinfo@oecd-nea.org
Additional file attached:Cf252U235_HighThreshold.pdf