<![CDATA[NEA publications]]> /tools/publication Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0200 Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0200 contact@oecd-nea.org (OECD Nuclear Energy Agency) Copyright 2017 OECD/NEA /tools/images/nea.jpg <![CDATA[NEA publications]]> /tools/publication NEA Framework en-gb http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 1440 <![CDATA[State-of-the-Art Report on Molten Corium Concrete Interaction and Ex-Vessel Molten Core Coolability]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7392 7392 Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0200 <![CDATA[NEA Workshop on Stakeholder Involvement in Nuclear Decision Making]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7302 7302 management, health policy and sustainability, they can often generate considerable interest and concern.
Actors involved in the nuclear energy sector, including regulators, governments and licensees, share
the goal of reaching accepted, sustainable decisions and to ensure that the decision-making process
is transparent. Stakeholder involvement in decision making is today seen as an essential means for
improving decisions and for optimising their implementation.

In this context, the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) organised a Workshop on Stakeholder Involvement in
Nuclear Decision Making in January 2017, acknowledging that different countries and sectors may face
similar challenges and that sharing experiences and approaches could be useful. The workshop was an
opportunity to bring together experts with first-hand knowledge and experience in areas related to
nuclear law, regulatory practices, radiological protection, nuclear waste management, the deployment of
new nuclear facilities, extended operation of nuclear facilities, deployment of other energy technologies
and infrastructures, and social and traditional media.

This summary report attempts to capture the collective wisdom generated over three days of interaction.
It highlights some commonalities and differences in views and approaches, and identifies particular
lessons that can be applied to improve the strategy and practice of involving stakeholders in decision
making. Overall, the learning gained from this workshop can benefit governments and citizens alike.]]>
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[Addressing Uncertainties in Cost Estimates for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7344 7344 Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0200 <![CDATA[National Inventories and Management Strategies for Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7371 7371
The diversity in classification schemes across countries has restricted the possibility of comparing waste inventories and led to difficulties in interpreting waste management practices, both nationally and internationally. To help improve this situation, the Nuclear Energy Agency developed a methodology that ensures consistency of national radioactive waste and spent fuel inventory data when presenting them in a common scheme in direct connection with accepted management strategy and disposal routes. This report is a follow up to the 2016 report that introduced the methodology and presenting scheme for spent fuel, and it now extends this methodology and presenting scheme to all types of radioactive waste and corresponding management strategies.]]>
Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[Sourcebook of International Activities Related to the Development of Safety Cases for Deep Geological Repositories]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7341 7341 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0200 <![CDATA[Recycling and Reuse of Materials Arising from the Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7310 7310 Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0200 <![CDATA[NEA News Vol. 35.1]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7347 7347 Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0200 <![CDATA[Rapport annuel 2016 de l'AEN]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7350 7350 Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0200 <![CDATA[International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments (IRPhe Project)]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7329 7329
This handbook contains reactor physics benchmark specifications that have been derived from experiments performed at nuclear facilities around the world. The benchmark specifications are intended for use by reactor designers, safety analysts and nuclear data evaluators to validate calculation techniques and data. Example calculations are presented; these do not constitute a validation or endorsement of the codes or cross-section data.

The 2016 edition of the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments contains data from 151 experimental series that were performed at 50 reactor facilities. To be published as approved benchmarks, the experiments must be evaluated against agreed technical criteria and reviewed by the IRPhE Technical Review Group. A total of 146 of the 151 evaluations are published as approved benchmarks. The remaining five evaluations are published as draft documents only.

New to the handbook is the evaluation of the CERES Phase II validation of fission product poisoning through reactivity worth measurements, which includes 13 fission products. The front cover of this year?s handbook shows the MINERVE reactor used to obtain the results.]]>
Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[NEA Annual Report 2016]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7349 7349 Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0200 <![CDATA[Uranium 2016: Resources, Production and Demand (Executive Summary)]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7388 7388 Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0200 <![CDATA[Impacts of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident on Nuclear Development Policies]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7212 7212
This study examines changes to policies, and plans and attempts to distinguish the impact of the Fukushima Daiichi accident from other factors that have affected policymaking in relation to nuclear energy, in particular electricity market economics, financing challenges and competition from other sources (gas, coal and renewables). It also examines changes over time to long-term, quantitative country projections, which reveal interesting trends on the possible role of nuclear energy in future energy systems.]]>
Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[International Conference on Geological Repositories]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7345 7345
Building upon the success of previous conferences held in Denver (1999), Stockholm (2003), Berne (2007) and Toronto (2012), the ICGR 2016 brought together high-level decision makers from regulatory and local government bodies, waste management organisations and public stakeholder communities to review current perspectives of geological repository development. This publication provides a synthesis of the 2016 conference on continued engagement and safe implementation of repositories, which was designed to promote information and experience sharing, particularly in the development of polices and regulatory frameworks. Repository safety, and the planning and implementation of repository programmes with societal involvement, as well as ongoing work within different international organisations, were also addressed at the conference.]]>
Tue, 04 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[NEA News Vol. 34.2]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7292 7292
Topics covered in this issue include: the NEA Nuclear Innovation 2050 Initiative; the International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation; NEA collaborative activities related to accident-tolerant fuels; costing for decommissioning; the 10th national workshop of the NEA Forum on Stakeholder Confidence and the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology.

A special thank you to the many contributors to this edition of NEA News: Axel Breest, Oscar Cabellos, Marc Deffrennes, Aleshia Duncan, James Dyrda, Mari Gillogly, Kamishan Martin, Simone Massara, Margaret McGrath, Franco Michel-Sendis, Fiona Rayment, Michael Siemann and Inge Weber.]]>
Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0100
<![CDATA[Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 98]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7313 7313 the field of nuclear law. It provides readers with authoritative and comprehensive information on nuclear
law developments. Published free online twice a year in both English and French, it features topical
articles written by renowned legal experts, covers legislative developments worldwide and reports on
relevant case law, bilateral and international agreements as well as regulatory activities of international
Feature articles in this issue include: "Strengthening the international legal framework for nuclear security:
Better sooner rather than later"; "Brexit, Euratom and nuclear proliferation"; and "McMunn et al. V Babcock
and Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc., et al.: The long road to dismissal".]]>
Fri, 24 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0100
<![CDATA[Communication on the Safety Case for a Deep Geological Repository]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7336 7336 Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0100 <![CDATA[NEA Strategic Plan 2017-2022]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7295 7295 Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0100 <![CDATA[Plan stratégique de l'AEN 2017-2022]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7296 7296 Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0100 <![CDATA[International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7328 7328
This handbook contains criticality safety benchmark specifications that have been derived from experiments performed at various critical facilities around the world. The benchmark specifications are intended for use by criticality safety engineers to validate calculation techniques used to establish minimum subcritical margins for operations with fissile material and to determine criticality alarm requirements and placement. Many of the specifications are also useful for nuclear data testing. Example calculations are presented; however, these do not constitute a validation of the codes or cross-section data.

The evaluated criticality safety benchmark data are given in nine volumes. These volumes span over 70 000 pages and contain 570 evaluations with benchmark specifications for 4 913 critical, near-critical or subcritical configurations, 45 criticality alarm placement/shielding configurations with multiple dose points for each, and 215 configurations that have been categorised as fundamental physics measurements that are relevant to criticality safety applications.

New to the handbook are 15 critical experiments with highly enriched uranium in an iron matrix performed to support the design of a repetitively pulsed reactor called the Sorgenta Rapida Reactor (SORA) at the Eurotom Research Centre in Ispra, Italy. A photograph of this experiment assembly is shown on the front cover.]]>
Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0100
<![CDATA[Nuclear Energy Data 2016]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7300 7300 reports documenting nuclear power status in NEA member countries and in the OECD area. Information
provided by governments includes statistics on installed generating capacity, total electricity produced
by all sources and by nuclear power, nuclear energy policies and fuel cycle developments, as well as
projections of nuclear generating capacity and electricity production to 2035, where available. Total
electricity generation at nuclear power plants and the share of electricity production from nuclear power
plants increased slightly in 2015, by 0.2% and 0.1%, respectively. Two new units were connected to the
grid in 2015, in Russia and Korea; two reactors returned to operation in Japan under the new regulatory
regime; and seven reactors were officially shut down - five in Japan, one in Germany and one in the
United Kingdom. Governments committed to having nuclear power in the energy mix advanced plans
for developing or increasing nuclear generating capacity, with the preparation of new build projects
progressing in Finland, Hungary, Turkey and the United Kingdom. Further details on these and other
developments are provided in the publication's numerous tables, graphs and country reports.

This publication contains "StatLinks". For each StatLink, the reader will find a URL which leads to the
corresponding spreadsheet. These links work in the same way as an Internet link.
Donnees sur l'energie nucleaire 2016

Les Donnees sur l'energie nucleaire, compilation annuelle de statistiques et de rapports nationaux de
l'Agence de l'OCDE pour l'energie nucleaire, presentent la situation de l'energie nucleaire dans les pays
membres de l'AEN et dans la zone de l'OCDE. Les informations communiquees par les gouvernements
comprennent des statistiques sur la puissance installee, la production d'electricite totale et nucleaire,
les politiques nucleaires, les evolutions du cycle du combustible ainsi que, lorsqu'elles sont disponibles,
des projections jusqu'en 2035 de la puissance nucleaire et de la production d'electricite. En 2015, la
production totale d'electricite des centrales nucleaires ainsi que la part du nucleaire dans la production
d'electricite ont legerement augmente, de 0,2 % et 0,1 % respectivement. Deux nouveaux reacteurs ont
ete raccordes au reseau en Russie et en Coree, deux reacteurs ont ete remis en service au Japon, ou un
nouveau regime de surete est en vigueur, et sept reacteurs ont ete mis officiellement et definitivement a
l'arret - cinq au Japon, un en Allemagne et un au Royaume-Uni. Les pays decides a inclure le nucleaire
dans leur bouquet energetique ont poursuivi leurs projets de developpement ou d'augmentation de
la puissance nucleaire installee, et ont realise des avancees dans de futurs projets de construction en
Finlande, en Hongrie, au Royaume-Uni et en Turquie. Le lecteur trouvera de plus amples informations sur
ces evolutions et d'autres developpements dans les nombreux tableaux, graphiques et rapports nationaux
que contient cet ouvrage.
Cette publication contient des "StatLinks". Fonctionnant comme un lien internet, un StatLink fournit
l'acces a la feuille de calcul correspondante.]]>
Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0100
<![CDATA[Management of Radioactive Waste after a Nuclear Power Plant Accident]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7305 7305 Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0100 <![CDATA[Uranium 2016: Resources, Production and Demand]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7301 7301 Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0100 <![CDATA[Small Modular Reactors]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7213 7213
This report assesses the size of the market for SMRs that are currently being developed and that have the potential to broaden the ways of deploying nuclear power in different parts of the world. The study focuses on light water SMRs that are expected to be constructed in the coming decades and that strongly rely on serial, factory-based production of reactor modules. In a high-case scenario, up to 21 GWe of SMRs could be added globally by 2035, representing approximately 3% of total installed nuclear capacity.]]>
Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 97 - Volume 1/2016]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7311 7311
Feature articles in this issue include "Nuclear Third Party Liability in Germany" and "Towards Nuclear Disarmament: State of Affairs in the International Legal Framework".]]>
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[Financing the Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7326 7326
Decommissioning planning can be subject to considerable uncertainties, particularly in relation to potential changes in financial markets, in energy policies or in the conditions and requirements for decommissioning individual nuclear installations, and such uncertainties need to be reflected in regularly updated cost estimates.

This booklet offers a useful overview of the relevant aspects of financing the decommissioning of nuclear facilities. It provides information on cost estimation for decommissioning, as well as details about funding mechanisms and the management of funds based on current practice in NEA member countries.]]>
Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[Japan's Siting Process for the Geological Disposal of High-level Radioactive Waste]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7331 7331 Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0200 <![CDATA[National Inventories and Management Strategies for Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7323 7323
The diversity in classification schemes across countries has restricted the possibility of comparing waste inventories and led to difficulties in interpreting waste management practices, both nationally and internationally. To help improve this situation, the Nuclear Energy Agency proposed to develop a methodology that would ensure consistency of national radioactive waste inventory data when presenting them in a common scheme. This report provides such a methodology and presenting scheme for spent nuclear fuel and for waste arising from reprocessing. The extension of the methodology and presenting scheme to other types of radioactive waste and corresponding management strategies is envisaged in a second phase.]]>
Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[NEA News, No. 34.1]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7291 7291
Topics covered in this edition of the NEA News include assessing the full costs of electricity; nuclear power plant decommissioning costs in perspective; nuclear safety: five years after the Fukushima Daiichi accident; strengthening the scientific basis of radiological protection; The NEA Nuclear Education, Skills and Technology (NEST) Framework; OECD and NEA countries' national frameworks for nuclear activities and spotlight on Finland: the world's first deep geological repository.

A special thank you to the many contributors to this edition of NEA News: Jan Horst Keppler, Geoffrey Rothwell, Marc Deffrennes, Inge Weber, Ho Nieh, Andrew White, Nancy Salgado, Ted Lazo, Liuidmila Adreeva, Jim Gulliford, Kaan Kuzeyli and Olli Nevander.]]>
Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[Strategic Considerations for the Sustainable Remediation of Nuclear Installations]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7290 7290
This report draws on recent experience of NEA member countries in nuclear site remediation during decommissioning in order to identify strategic considerations for the sustainable remediation of subsurface contamination – predominantly contaminated soil and groundwater – to describe good practice, and to make recommendations for further research and development. It provides insights for the decision makers, regulators, implementers and stakeholders involved in nuclear site decommissioning so as to ensure the sustainable remediation of nuclear sites, now and in the future.]]>
Mon, 23 May 2016 00:00:00 +0200
<![CDATA[Annual Report 2015]]> http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/publication?id=7293 7293
At the end of 2015, there were 442 reactors in operation in 33 countries worldwide, representing over 380 GWe of capacity, with NEA member countries operating 348 of these reactors (319 GWe, or 84% of the world total). Ten reactors were connected to the grid in 2015. Construction began on 4 reactors, bringing the total number under construction to 67.

The Annual Report also provides a full list of the NEA publications produced during the year. All NEA publications can be downloaded free of charge from the NEA website at www.oecd-nea.oreg/pub. The reports address key issues in relation to nuclear development and the fuel cycle, nuclear safety and regulation, radioactive waste management, radiological protection, nuclear science, nuclear data and nuclear law.]]>
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0200