The Economics of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle (1994)
In early 1991, an expert group, with a membership drawn from fourteen
countries and four international
organisations, was formed to examine the economics of the fuel cycle
with particular reference to a power
station comprising a pressurised water reactor (PWR) commissioning in
the year 2000. The expert group
finalised its report at the end of 1993. The task of the expert group
was to update the OECD/NEA 1983/84 study which was published in 1985.
That study defined the levelised lifetime fuel cycle cost using internationally
accepted investment appraisal methodology. Costs were derived for fuel
cycles based on reprocessing and on long-term spent fuel storage followed
by direct disposal. The current study repeats that approach. Use of
a 5 per cent reference case discount rate is still considered appropriate
in reflecting the consensus of national practices. It also enables direct
comparison to be made with previous results. Variations due to the use
of different discount rates are also given.
Table of Contents
Summary and Introduction
Executive Summary
1. Introduction
Chapters 2 and 3
2. Methodology and common assumptions
- 2.1 Methodology
- 2.2 Scope of the study
- 2.3 Common assumptions
- 2.3.1 Costing basis
- 2.3.2 Discount rate
3. The nuclear fuel cycle
- 3.1 General
- 3.2 The front-end of the fuel cycle
- 3.2.1 Uranium mining and milling
- 3.2.2 Conversion
- 3.2.3 Enrichment
- 3.2.4 Fabrication
- 3.2.5 Wastes arising in the front-end of the fuel cycle
- 3.3 Fuel at reactor
- 3.4 The back-end of the fuel cycle
- 3.4.1 Transport and interim storage of spent fuel
- 3.4.2 Reprocessing option
- 3.4.3 Direct disposal option
- 3.4.4 Final disposal of waste
4.The costs of the PWR fuel cycle stages
4.1 The front-end of the fuel cycle
- 4.1.1 Uranium purchase
- 4.1.2 Conversion
- 4.1.3 Enrichment
- 4.1.4 Uranium oxide fuel fabrication
- 4.2 Fuel at the reactor
- 4.3 The back-end of the fuel cycle
- 4.3.1 General
- 4.3.2 Reprocessing option costs
- 4.3.3 Direct disposal option costs
- 4.4 Environmental factors
- 4.5 Safeguards
5.The calculation of total fuel costs for PWR
- 5.1 Principles of assembling stage costs into overall fuel cost
- 5.2 Basic data
- 5.2.1 Choice of reactor parameters and base date
- 5.2.2 Tails assay for enrichment
- 5.2.3 Lead and lag time
- 5.2.4 Loss factor
- 5.2.5 Unit price assumptions
- 5.3 PWR cost calculations
- 5.3.1 Costs for the reprocessing option
- 5.3.2 Time flow of costs for the reprocessing option
- 5.3.3 Costs for the direct disposal option
- 5.3.4 Time flow of costs for the direct disposal option
- 5.4 BWR fuel cycle cost
6.Sensitivity analyses for PWR fuel costs
- 6.1 General
- 6.2 Technical parameters
- 6.2.1 Reactor life
- 6.2.2 Tails assay
- 6.2.3 Burn-up
- 6.3 Discount rate
- 6.4 Fuel cycle component prices
- 6.5 Comparison of total fuel cycle costs
- 6.6 Likely range of total fuel cycle costs
7.Comparison between the results of the present
study and
the 1985 study
8.Other fuel cycles
- 8.1 CANDU
- 8.1.1 CANDU fuel
- 8.1.2 Basic assumptions
- 8.1.3 Fuel cycle costs for CANDU
- 8.2 ATR
- 8.2.1 ATR fuel
- 8.2.2 Basic assumptions
- 8.2.3 Fuel cycle costs for ATR
Chapters 9 and 10
9. Conclusions
10. References
ANNEXES
- Method of calculating a levelised price
and a fuel cycle cost
- Comparison between investment appraisal
and financial appraisal
- Reprocessing option cost estimates and
future trends
- Direct disposal option cost estimates and
future trends: Sweden (reference)
- Direct disposal option cost estimates:
United States
- Direct disposal option cost estimates:
Germany
- Comparison of waste disposal costs
- Plutonium and recovered uranium credits
- Nuclear fuel cycle costs versus burn-up
- Sensitivity analysis on estimated fuel
cycle cost
- List of abbreviations, units and glossary
of terms
- List of members of the expert group and
the editorial review group
Download full publication
in Acrobat PDF (1.7 mb)
This publication is out of print and can only be obtained from this
website.